Individuality Shines Through in the New Style of Composing with Prompts

In recent years, a new style of composition has been gaining attention, where composers write prompts to generate musical output. In this method, the composer provides prompts (instructions) to an AI, which then generates music based on those prompts. At first glance, it might seem like the composer’s individuality could be lost in this process.

However, in reality, the composer’s individuality is strongly reflected in the process of writing the prompts. The choice of prompts, the words used, and the desired musical qualities all reveal the composer’s own sensibilities, aesthetic preferences, and thoughts about music.

For example, one composer might write a prompt like “create a melancholic piano ballad expressing the pain of unrequited love,” while another might write, “compose an energetic hard rock piece that excites the listener.” The content of the prompts is unique to each composer, reflecting their individual style.

Individuality in Evaluating the Output

When composing music by writing prompts, the composer’s individuality also shows in how they evaluate the AI-generated output. Some composers might use the AI-generated music as-is, while others might treat the AI’s output merely as a reference and add their own arrangements to it.

Moreover, the quality standards that composers demand from the output also vary. Some composers might seek perfection in the AI-generated music, while others might prioritize originality and freshness, even if the output is a bit rough around the edges.

These differences in evaluation criteria clearly reflect the composer’s individuality. What kind of music they consider ideal and what kind of expression they aim for are influenced by each composer’s values and aesthetics.

Individuality in the Relationship Between Prompts and Output

When composing music by writing prompts, it’s also worth noting the relationship between the prompts and the output. Some composers might emphasize providing detailed prompts and having the AI faithfully follow them. In contrast, others might intentionally keep the prompts abstract, allowing more room for the AI’s creativity.

The perceived distance between the prompts and the output also reflects the composer’s individuality. How they choose to collaborate with the AI, how much they leave up to the AI, and at what point they inject their own sensibilities—these judgments vary from composer to composer.

Conclusion

Even in the new style of composing music by writing prompts, the composer’s individuality is fully expressed. The content of the prompts, the evaluation criteria for the output, and the relationship between the prompts and the output all reflect each composer’s unique sensibilities, aesthetic preferences, and thoughts about music.

Therefore, when venturing into this prompt-based composing style, it’s essential to cherish your own individuality. Collaborate effectively with the AI while pursuing your unique expression. By doing so, you’ll create one-of-a-kind music filled with your personal touch.